![]() We repeat them below only as necessary to reach our conclusion. I The facts of this case are known by the parties. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the judgment of the district court. Silicon Knights additionally raises a number of evidentiary issues and challenges the district court s grant of several remedies in favor of Epic. Silicon Knights also appeals from the district court s denial of its request for judgment as a matter of law on Epic s copyright infringement and misappropriation of trade secrets counterclaims against it, both of which proceeded to trial and resulted in a jury verdict against Silicon Knights. ( Epic ) on Silicon Knights fraud and fraud-related claims against Epic. ( Silicon Knights ) appeals from the district court s grant of judgment as a matter of law in favor of Epic Games, Inc. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Collins, HUNTON & WILLIAMS LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Dennis Fairbanks, Raleigh, North Carolina, Cassandra C. Silver, III, WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Keller, KRIEG KELLER SLOAN REILLEY & ROMAN LLP, San Francisco, California Hayden J. Michael Randolph Shebelskie, HUNTON & WILLIAMS, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Holland, KRIEG KELLER SLOAN REILLEY & ROMAN LLP, San Francisco, California, for Appellant. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. (5:07 cv 00275 D) Argued: DecemDecided: JanuBefore AGEE, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. ![]() Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. ![]() EPIC GAMES, INC., a Maryland Corporation, Defendant-Appellee. 12-2489 SILICON KNIGHTS, INC., an Ontario (Canada) Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |